+917292009966 +917292006699 Whatsapp
Tasha Realty
 
 

News: Uphaar fire: Ansal brothers tampering with evidence eroded judicial integrity, court told-04-06-2022

https://realty.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/regulatory/uphaar-fire-ansal-brothers-tampering-with-evidence-eroded-judicial-integrity-court-told/91996295

The prosecution submitted to District Judge Dharmesh Sharma while opposing a plea filed by the Ansal brothers challenging their conviction and the 7-year jail terms by a magisterial court in November last year.

evidence eroded judicial integrity, court told, Real Estate News, ET RealEstate https://realty.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/regulatory/uphaar-fire-ansal-brothers-tampering-with-evidence-eroded-judicial-integrity-court-told/91996295 2/10 NEW DELHI: Delhi police Friday told a court that real estate tycoons Sushil and Gopal Ansal tampering with evidence in the 1997 case of Uphaar cinema fire, which had claimed 59 lives, "seriously eroded the judicial integrity of entire Delhi judiciary."

The prosecution submitted to District Judge Dharmesh Sharma while opposing a plea filed by the Ansal brothers challenging their conviction and the 7-year jail terms by a magisterial court in November last year.

The court had also imposed a fine of Rs 2.25 crore each on the Ansals.

Public Prosecutor A T Ansari termed the findings in the magisterial court's judgement as "well-founded", and said that no court of law can afford to turn a blind eye to the commission of such an offence

"This is the case which has not only undermined the majesty of law but has also seriously eroded the judicial integrity of the entire Delhi Judiciary. This is the case which has also seriously eroded the long-cherished confidence of the public at large in our well-tested justice delivery system," the prosecution told the court.

The court had also awarded a 7-year-jail term each to former court staff Dinesh Chand Sharma and two others -- P P Batra and Anoop Singh -- and a fine of Rs three lakh each.

The case is related to tampering with the evidence in the main fire tragedy case in which the Ansals were convicted and sentenced to a 2-year jail term by the Supreme Court.

The SC however released them taking into account the prison time they had done on the condition that they pay a Rs 30 crore fine each, to be used for building a trauma centre in the national capital.

As per the charge sheet, the documents tampered with included a police memo giving details of recoveries immediately after the incident, Delhi Fire Service records pertaining to repair of transformer installed inside Uphaar, minutes of Managing Director's meetings, and four cheques.

Out of the six sets of documents, a cheque of ₹50 lakh, issued by Sushil Ansal to self, and minutes of the MD's meetings, proved beyond doubt that the two brothers were handling the day-to-day affairs of the theatre at the relevant time, the charge sheet had said.

It said the Ansals had taken the defence in the main case that they had no involvement in the day-to-day functioning.

The tampering was detected for the first time on July 20, 2002, and a departmental enquiry was initiated against Dinesh Chand Sharma. He was suspended and terminated from services on June 25, 2004.

The fire had broken out at the Uphaar cinema during the screening of the Hindi film 'Border' on June 13, 1997, claiming 59 lives.

DISCLAIMER: This website and the Information contained is in the process of being updated and the contents are under review/revision in terms of the Real Estate Regulation Act, 2016 and Rules there under (RERA), and will be reviewed from time to time. Till the time that the contents are fully updated, the same shall neither be construed to be any kind of advertisement, solicitation, marketing, Booking, offer for sale, invitation to offer within the purview of RERA and shall have no binding effect on the Company and nor constitute any offer and/or acceptance and/or contract and/or agreement and/or transaction and/or any intention thereof and/or a disclosure under any statute of any nature whatsoever. Please call to check the updated pricing, status etc. The photographs contained herein may be actual/stock/standard photography or rendered images used for the purpose and have been taken at a location other than the project site and are used to indicate a conceptual lifestyle. Actual product may vary/differ from what is indicated herein. The location info shown are indicative and selective representation of certain elements present/that may be present in and around the city/project site. No representations are made regarding existence/continuity of existence of any landmarks/locations shown. The landmarks/locations may be subject to change from time to time and such changes are completely outside our control. No representation or warranty is made or intended as to the accuracy or completeness of information under this website or as to its suitability or adequacy for any purpose. Before making a decision to purchase, you are requested to independently, either directly or through your legal/financial consultants, thoroughly verify all details/documents pertaining to the respective project as available on the respective RERA sites.The Company is not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the viewer relying only on such material/ information that is presently displayed on this website.